The Canon
Writer Natalie Angier took the podium to a smattering of applause. She said that she deserved it. The clapping. Not for writing a book (after all, everybody seems to do it), but for going almost 10 years, to the date, since her last root canal.
With a reference to the elusive, cavity-free "dental mensa club" and listing her own extensive tooth work, she introduced her book, The Canon, and the subject of microbiotics.
Plaque: 600 different species working together to beat one's teeth to a pulp.
Angier moved swiftly into the major principles of cellular structure and the capacity to communicate using her own teeth as an example, gesturing widely and growing evermore excited and impassioned with her subject, her book, with science.
A small woman, Angier was blocked almost completely by the podium and the microphone. I strained to see her from the second row. I couldn't imagine the complete lack of view from the back of the crowded store.
I regretted that people might miss her large eyes, expressive eyebrows and temperamental forehead, shifting from a mass of wrinkles to a cool smooth brow in a matter of seconds as she struggled for a word, for an answer, to better explain her ideas. Her voice rang clearly, though, as did her sentiments.
The renowned science writer moved swiftly through topics, through stories and jokes and complex principles in a way that even the most science-illiterate among us could follow. Then, again, I doubt there were many of those in a crowd that averaged 3.08 eyes per person. (Definitely more than half of the audience rocked nerd goggles not counting those among us with contacts or LASIK).
The woman beside me seemed almost beside herself with the author. She agreed vehemently , crying, "Oh! Oh, yes!" at regular intervals and laughing heartily. The writer seemed to have a fan. Or 40. Much of the crowd nodded in agreement when she addressed the non-glorious nature of the scientists' life in what the store owner dubbed "a world that doesn't seem fun from the outside."
Angier made it interesting, however. Fun. Almost. Some of her words lingered long after we walked into the warm, clear night.
"The source of its greatest strength is that it is uncertain," she said. "That uncertainty is always there."
It seemed to apply to much more than science. Maybe that was the point. Nothing exists without science.
She quoted an experiment an interviewee performed with science students, flipping coins and imagining the process. The professor quickly separated the real results from the fake.
"Real randomness looks like it has structure. You shouldn't impute meaning from patterns," Angier said. "See the world with less mystical import."
She talked about the Laws of Thermodynamics and about chaos: "Why is it that everything tends to gradually disintegrate?"
About astronomy: People think "night" but everything we know, we know by studying light. Not only that, we're always looking back in time.
Traversing a world of science in a rush of breath, I wondered how so much information could fit into such a small tome. So much wisdom. Then, again, the subtitle espoused "A Whirligig Tour of the Beautiful Basics of Science."
"Do not believe your disbelief," she said. "All you need is time and opportunity and you can do anything."
At the time, Angier was talking about evolution, but the words rang true in any event. The concept.
I realized that I could take the science out of the lecture and walk away a better person for having heard it. The science bit just made me feel a little smarter for a minute or two, happy to be in the company of seeming intellectuals.
In response to a question about taking scientific ideas to a harmful extreme, Angier thought for minute, brow wrinkled. She shrugged and replied, "I don't think the scientific way of knowing is the only way."
"I think we need art. We need music. We need love."
Personally, I need more exposure to writers like Angier.
Tag: Science
